Explore the Agenda

Smarter Model Selection: In Vivo, In Vitro & Computational Integration for Toxicology

8:55 am Chair’s Opening Remarks

Senior Director, AstraZeneca

9:00 am Evolving Safety Models: Integrating In Silico Insights & Tailored In Vitro Approaches for Smarter Early Target & Candidate Prioritization

Global Head, Early Safety Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim
  • Target safety and in silico alerts: leverage data and mechanistic insights to identify hazards linked to target biology or chemical structure before synthesis
  • Tailored in vitro models: beyond standard screens to understand toxicity drivers and prioritize candidates with the lowest risk
  • De-risk earlier with confidence: integrate early data into a decision strategy to reduce attrition and accelerate decision

9:30 am Advancing Computational Toxicology to Better Predict Safety for Complex Modalities Including Larger Molecules

Senior Scientist, Computational Toxicology, Abbvie
  • Benchmark evolving in silico approaches that bridge data gaps for large molecules and gene therapy where limited clinical and preclinical datasets hinder model accuracy and validation
  • Learn strategies to integrate computational insights with in vitro and in vivo evidence to strengthen species relevance decisions mitigate sampling bias and improve translatability across platforms
  • Explore how to evaluate combination therapy safety by modelling target pathway interactions dose considerations and additive or offsetting toxicity risks to support more confident regulatory acceptance

10:00 am Morning Break & Speed Networking

11:00 am Impact of Structural Alerts on Drug Discovery: A Comprehensive Analysis of Marketed Drugs

Scientific Associate Director, Takeda Pharmaceutical
  • Re-examining the role of structural alerts by analyzing over 1,000 orally administered marketed drugs to understand how frequently alerts occur in clinically successful compounds
  • Disentangling correlation from causation by evaluating relationships between structural alerts, reactive metabolite formation, DILI potential, daily dose, and therapeutic area
  • Informing smarter de-risking strategies by showing where structural alerts meaningfully contribute to risk assessment and where over-reliance may unnecessarily limit innovation

11:30 am Case Study of Microphysiological System Models for ILD: Developing In Vitro Assays for Evaluating ADC Lung Safety

Research Fellow, Emerging Therapeutic Platforms (Development Sciences) Director, Abbvie
  • Leveraging complex in vitro models to evaluate ADC-induced lung toxicity
  • Building in vitro tools for high-throughput compound screening
  • Pending relevance to pathogenesis of ILD, high-throughput imaging-based assays may potentially be incorporated into a holistic screening approach to differentiate ADCs and guide selection of safer compounds

12:00 pm Lunch Break

Regulatory Strategy & Translational Model Selection in Toxicology

1:00 pm IQ MPS Affiliate & Industry Collaboration: Accelerating Adoption of In Vitro NAMs

Director, Investigative Toxicology, Pfizer
  • Cross-pharma collaboration for in vitro NAM implementation in drug development
  • Strategic global regulatory engagement and thought leadership
  • Driving industry benchmarking, model qualification, and education

1:30 pm Applying Liver MPS Technologies to Improve Preclinical DILI Prediction

Senior Scientist, Nonclinical Safety & Pharmacology (NCSP), Takeda Pharmaceutical
  • Demonstrate how liver microphysiological systems improve mechanistic understanding and human relevance in assessing drug‑induced liver injury
  • Present case studies where liver MPS provide earlier or more predictive detection of hepatotoxic liabilities compared with traditional in vitro assays
  • Highlight translational biomarkers and functional readouts from MPS that strengthen decision‑making in preclinical safety assessment

2:00 pm Afternoon Break & Poster Session

3:00 pm Panel Discussion: Regulatory & Pharma Expectations in the Adoption of NAMs: IQ MPS Affiliate Perspective

Research Fellow, Emerging Therapeutic Platforms (Development Sciences) Director, Abbvie
Associate Scientific Director, Biogen
Senior Scientist, Nonclinical Safety & Pharmacology (NCSP), Takeda Pharmaceutical
Director, Investigative Toxicology, Pfizer
Postdoctoctoral Resercher, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT)
  • How pharma teams are collaborating within IQ MPS Affiliate to progress simple and complex in vitro NAM platforms toward regulatory acceptance
  • Review insights from recent FDA publication on submitted NAM case examples and reviewer feedback – what works and what can be improved (need for well-articulated context-of-use)
  • Where AI-enabled validation initiatives like VICT3R can strengthen confidence by benchmarking prediction accuracy against real clinical outcomes
  • Gain practical guidance for integrating in vitro and in silico NAMs into toxicology packages without over-claiming translatability
  • What industry needs from consortia, regulators, and data-sharing frameworks to accelerate adoption of novel platforms covering diverse mechanisms of injury

4:00 pm Translating Preclinical Toxicology & Efficacy Insights into a Successful IND

Executive Director, Nonclinical Development & Safety, Century Therapeutics
  • Evaluate in vitro discovery and investigative toxicology in cell therapy platforms to define target biology, evaluate therapeutic liabilities, and establish early human relevance
  • Review fit-for-purpose in vivo models in cell therapies to integrate safety with efficacy, PK, and biodistribution, while acknowledging species differences and model limitations
  • Discover a strategy integrating in vitro and in vivo data to address safety liabilities while leveraging efficacy strengths for a regulatory-aligned IND in cell therapy

Managing Toxicity Alongside Efficacy to Optimize Study Designs

4:30 pm Balancing Toxicology & Efficacy to Design Studies That Predict Real Clinical Value

Director & Head, In Vivo Pharmacology, Simcere Pharmaceutical Group
  • Avoid costly pipeline pivots by distinguishing regulatory-driven toxicology studies from internal proof of-efficacy experiments that determine whether a program is worth advancing
  • Improve Phase 1 success rates by integrating mechanistic efficacy insights upfront, not after GLP, ensuring safety signals are interpreted in the context of therapeutic promise
  • Strengthen decision-making by aligning toxicology, pharmacology, and regulatory expectations early so resource-limited programs don’t over-optimize for approval while under-investing in efficacy

5:00 pm Chair’s Closing Remarks

Senior Director, AstraZeneca

5:05 pm End of Conference Day One